|Case Forum:||Michigan Supreme Court|
|Keywords:||preemption, zoning, medical marijuana, Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), Michigan Zoning Enabling Act (MZEA), federal Controlled Substances Act|
Andrew J. Mulder | Vincent L. Duckworth | Cunningham Dalman, P.C. | 321 Settlers Road | Holland, MI 49422-1767 | 616-392-1821
The City of Wyoming’s zoning ordinance that prohibits all illegal land uses is enforceable against Appellee, a City of Wyoming Resident and medical marijuana patient under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), because the ordinance is authorized by Michigan Zoning Enabling Act (MZEA) and is not preempted by MMMA. For public policy reasons, such as local government having broad authority over land use and issues of local concern, the MMMA should not be read to supersede the authority of municipalities to enact and enforce lawful zoning regulations under MZEA. Also, unlike similar Michigan laws, the MMMA does not expressly limit the power of local governments to regulate land use. In addition, the Court of Appeals did not engage in the proper legal analysis for when a city zoning rule is challenged as an exclusionary zoning rule. Lastly, Appellee’s claimed use is not a land use in violation of the zoning ordinance; therefore, there is no incompatibility between the zoning ordinance and the MMMA.
In a unanimous opinion by Justice MCCORMACK, the Supreme Court held:
|MSC requested LDF amicus brief?||No|
The City of Wyoming enacted an amendment to its zoning ordinance which provides: “USES PROHIBITED BY LAW. Unless not expressly permitted under this Ordinance are prohibited in all districts. Uses that are contrary to federal law, state law or