    {"id":1079,"date":"2013-03-07T13:41:00","date_gmt":"2013-03-07T18:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"\/advocacy\/inside208\/post\/House-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers.aspx"},"modified":"2013-03-07T13:41:00","modified_gmt":"2013-03-07T18:41:00","slug":"house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/","title":{"rendered":"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday the House Commerce Committee considered <a href=\"http:\/\/legislature.mi.gov\/documents\/2013-2014\/billintroduced\/House\/pdf\/2013-HIB-4249.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">House Bill 4249<\/a>, a bill that would prohibit local units of government from passing an ordinance or policy requiring private employers to mandate either paid or unpaid leave time for its employees.<\/p>\n<p>While we do not know of any communities who have such policies or are interested in passing such policies, the legislation violates local control, and the League opposed the legislation.<\/p>\n<p>It is expected to be voted on next week.<\/p>\n<p><em>Samantha Harkins is the Director of State Affairs for the League. She can be  reached at  517-908-0306 and sharkins at mml.org.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday the House Commerce Committee considered House Bill 4249, a bill that would prohibit local units of government from passing an ordinance or policy requiring private employers to mandate either paid or unpaid leave time for its employees. While we do not know of any communities who have such policies  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":456,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22,26,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legislative-link-articles","category-municipal-finance","category-municipal-services","mml-onemagnify-plugin"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers - Inside 208<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers - Inside 208\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Yesterday the House Commerce Committee considered House Bill 4249, a bill that would prohibit local units of government from passing an ordinance or policy requiring private employers to mandate either paid or unpaid leave time for its employees. While we do not know of any communities who have such policies [...]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Inside 208\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/MMLeague\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-03-07T18:41:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/10\/Inside-208-Site-Image.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"sharkins\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@MMLeague\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@MMLeague\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"sharkins\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"sharkins\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/person\/fc1442b264a6c0ddb80c58edf86bc4ab\"},\"headline\":\"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-07T18:41:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\"},\"wordCount\":109,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Legislative Link Articles\",\"Municipal Finance\",\"Municipal Services\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\",\"name\":\"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers - Inside 208\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-07T18:41:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/\",\"name\":\"Michigan Municipal League - Inside 208\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Michigan Municipal League\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/mml-logo-square-e1673462978850.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/mml-logo-square-e1673462978850.jpg\",\"width\":600,\"height\":303,\"caption\":\"Michigan Municipal League\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/MMLeague\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/MMLeague\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/mmleague\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/person\/fc1442b264a6c0ddb80c58edf86bc4ab\",\"name\":\"sharkins\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"sharkins\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/author\/sharkins\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers - Inside 208","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers - Inside 208","og_description":"Yesterday the House Commerce Committee considered House Bill 4249, a bill that would prohibit local units of government from passing an ordinance or policy requiring private employers to mandate either paid or unpaid leave time for its employees. While we do not know of any communities who have such policies [...]","og_url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/","og_site_name":"Inside 208","article_publisher":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/MMLeague","article_published_time":"2013-03-07T18:41:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/10\/Inside-208-Site-Image.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"sharkins","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@MMLeague","twitter_site":"@MMLeague","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"sharkins"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/"},"author":{"name":"sharkins","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/person\/fc1442b264a6c0ddb80c58edf86bc4ab"},"headline":"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers","datePublished":"2013-03-07T18:41:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/"},"wordCount":109,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Legislative Link Articles","Municipal Finance","Municipal Services"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/","url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/","name":"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers - Inside 208","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-03-07T18:41:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/2013\/03\/07\/house-considers-local-preemption-on-leave-time-for-private-employers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"House considers local preemption on leave time for private employers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/","name":"Michigan Municipal League - Inside 208","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#organization","name":"Michigan Municipal League","url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/mml-logo-square-e1673462978850.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/mml-logo-square-e1673462978850.jpg","width":600,"height":303,"caption":"Michigan Municipal League"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/facebook.com\/MMLeague","https:\/\/x.com\/MMLeague","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/mmleague\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/person\/fc1442b264a6c0ddb80c58edf86bc4ab","name":"sharkins","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"sharkins"},"url":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/author\/sharkins\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/456"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1079"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mml.org\/inside208\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}